This is a class action lawsuit charging Brown University, its president, and its athletics director (collectively Brown) with discrimination against women in the operation of its intercollegiate athletics program, in violation of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. Rather, the Seventh Circuit endorsed the test as one for compliance, in dismissing the plaintiff's claims. Id. 684, 121 L.Ed.2d 605 (1993); Young v. Herring, 917 F.2d 858 (5th Cir.1990); Fogel v. Chestnutt, 668 F.2d 100, 109 (2d Cir.1981), cert. There is simply no other way to assess participation rates, interest levels, and abilities. Id. 1993) Rule: A district court, faced with a motion for preliminary injunction, must assess the request in four particular ways, evaluating: (1) the movant's probability of victory on the merits; (2) the potential for irreparable harm if the injunction is refused; (3) the balance of interests as between the parties, i.e . Cohen II, 991 F.2d at 901 (finding no constitutional infirmity, assuming arguendo, that the regulation creates a classification somewhat in favor of women). In Adarand, the Supreme Court reasoned that it may not always be clear that a so-called preference is in fact benign. Id. Id. Applying 1681(b), the prior panel held that Title IX does not mandate strict numerical equality between the gender balance of a college's athletic program and the gender balance of its student body. Cohen II, 991 F.2d at 894. of Med., 976 F.2d 791, 795 (1st Cir.1992), cert. The easy answer lies in ordering Brown to comply with prong three by upgrading the women's gymnastics, fencing, skiing, and water polo teams to university-funded varsity status. We assume, without deciding, that Brown has not waived its equal protection claim and has standing to raise it. provide for the women of America something that is rightfully theirs-an equal chance to attend the schools of their choice, to develop the skills they want, and to apply those skills with the knowledge that they will have a fair chance to secure the jobs of their choice with equal pay for equal work. On 01/15/2021 Cohen, filed a Civil Right - Other Civil Right court case against Walsh, in U.S. Courts Of Appeals. IA, respectively, are co-counsel for the plaintiff class in Cohen v. Brown University, along with Lynette Labinger of . If so, the inquiry ends and Brown should be judged to be in compliance. 1681(b) (West 1990) (emphasis added). 1681(a) (West 1990). The doctrine of the law of the case directs that a decision of an appellate court on an issue of law, unless vacated or set aside, governs the issue during all subsequent stages of litigation in the nisi prius court and thereafter on any further appeal. Commercial Union Ins. at 8. That notwithstanding, where-as here-the resulting regulation is susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation, we owe no such deference to the interpretation chosen where the choice is made not by the agency but by the district court. . at 319, 97 S.Ct. On January 16, 1996, DED released a Clarification Memorandum, which does not change the existing standards for compliance, but which does provide further information and guidelines for assessing compliance under the three-part test. at 1064 n. 16; Weinberger v. Wiesenfeld, 420 U.S. 636, 638 n. 2, 95 S.Ct. at 188 n. 4. In its introduction, Brown makes clear that it would prefer to maintain its current program and that the plan submitted. at 980, and that, of the 894 undergraduate students competing on these teams, 63.3% (566) were men and 36.7% (328) were women, id. Moreover, Webster, which Cohen II cited along with Metro Broadcasting, was not overruled or in any way rendered suspect by Adarand. 20 U.S.C.A. Thus, the analytical result would be same, even if this were an affirmative action case. See Clarification Memorandum at 8 (If an institution has recently eliminated a viable team from the intercollegiate program, OCR will find that there is sufficient interest, ability, and available competition to sustain an intercollegiate team in that sport unless an institution can provide strong evidence that interest, ability or available competition no longer exists.); id. 9. Thus, Brown will fully comply with Title IX by meeting the standards of prong three, without approaching satisfaction of the standards of prong one. The majority offers no guidance to a school seeking to assess the levels of interest of its students. We have narrowly confined the intervening controlling authority exception to Supreme Court opinions, en banc opinions of this court, or statutory overrulings. In United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515, 116 S.Ct. This precedent-setting ruling, which set the standard for determining a school's compliance with Title IX in . The Court has been especially critical of the use of statistical evidence offered to prove generalized, stereotypical notions about men and women. As applied in the federal courts today, the law of the case doctrine more closely resembles the doctrine of stare decisis. Cohen II, 991 F.2d at 903. 1572, 55 L.Ed.2d 797 (1978) (summary affirmance of a district court decision upholding a provision of the Railroad Retirement Act that allowed women to retire at age 60 while men could not retire until age 65). Applying the second prong of the intermediate scrutiny test, we find that the means employed by the district court in fashioning relief for the statutory violation are clearly substantially related to these important objectives. Equal Protection is implicated where the claim is made that a classification made by the government intentionally subjects an individual to treatment different from similarly situated individuals based on an impermissible characteristic, such as race, national origin, or gender. Id. In the first appeal, this court rejected Brown's Fifth Amendment equal protection challenge to the statutory scheme. Furthermore, the claim that a reduction in the opportunities given to the overrepresented gender is an unacceptable method of coming into compliance with the three prong test is contrary to both Cohen II and comments of the majority opinion. Contact us. No aspect of the Title IX regime at issue in this case-inclusive of the statute, the relevant regulation, and the pertinent agency documents-mandates gender-based preferences or quotas, or specific timetables for implementing numerical goals. at 3-4. The Clarification Memorandum contains many examples illustrating how institutions may meet each prong of the three-part test and explains how participation opportunities are to be counted under Title IX. And if compliance with Title IX is to be measured through this sort of analysis, it is only practical that schools be given some clear way to establish that they have satisfied the requirements of the statute. Brown asserts, in the alternative, that if the district court properly construed the test, then the test itself violates Title IX and the United States Constitution. Subjects. This is not just a matter of semantics. 2264, 135 L.Ed.2d 735 (1996), the Court faced an Equal Protection challenge to Virginia's practice of maintaining the Virginia Military Institute as an all male institution. Nevertheless, Brown asserts that [w]hile Adarand is a case involving racial classification, its analysis clearly applies to gender classification as well. Id. [T]he Court proceeds to interpret exceedingly persuasive justification in a fashion that contradicts the reasoning of Hogan and our other precedents. Id. Regardless of the efforts made by the academic institution, the specter of a lawsuit would be ever-present. In Cohen II, we applied precisely this type of benign-classification analysis to what we viewed to be benign gender discrimination by the federal government. Cohen, et al v Walsh, et al | 21-1032 | Court Records - UniCourt We do not question Cohen II's application of 1681(b). 1946, 1961, 60 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). V. Strong, of Raleigh, for defendant. The regulation, therefore, allows schools to operate single-sex teams in contact sports. 29. E.g., Hogan, 458 U.S. at 724, 102 S.Ct. After mapping Title IX's rugged legal terrain and cutting a passable swath through the factual thicket that overspreads the parties' arguments, we affirm. at 214. Id. 1993) (hereinafter Moore). Read Cohen v. Brown University, 991 F.2d 888, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext's comprehensive legal database All State & Fed. The regulation at issue in this case, 34 C.F.R. 612 (1974).6 The regulations specifically address athletics at 34 C.F.R. During the same academic year, Brown's undergraduate enrollment comprised 52.4% (2,951) men and 47.6% (2,683) women. at 189. [24] This provision governs the distribution of athletic scholarships under the general caption of financial assistance in education programs. Hopwood v. Texas, 78 F.3d 932, 943-46 (5th Cir.) The district court's conclusion with respect to prong two, however, implies that a school must not only demonstrate that the proportion of women in their program is growing over time, it must also show that the absolute number of women participating is increasing.26. Where such a disparity has been established, the inquiry under prong three is whether the athletics interests and abilities of the underrepresented gender are fully and effectively accommodated, such that the institution may be found to comply with Title IX, notwithstanding the disparity.23. In Cohen II, a panel of this court squarely rejected Brown's constitutional and statutory challenges to the Policy Interpretation's three-part test, upholding the district court's interpretation of the Title IX framework applicable to intercollegiate athletics, Cohen II, 991 F.2d at 899-902, as well as its grant of a preliminary injunction in favor of the plaintiffs, id. The substantial proportionality contained in Benchmark 1 merely establishes such a safe harbor. See Hogan, 458 U.S. at 724 & n. 9, 102 S.Ct. 3331, 3336, 73 L.Ed.2d 1090 (1982), with Metro Broadcasting, 497 U.S. at 564-65, 110 S.Ct. Instead, this approach freezes that disparity by law, thereby disadvantaging further the underrepresented gender. Brown's proposed compliance plan stated its goal as follows: The plan has one goal: to make the gender ratio among University-funded teams at Brown substantially proportionate to the gender ratio of the undergraduate student body. at 71,418). Majority Opinion at 163. at 12. The district court noted that the four demoted teams were eligible for NCAA competition, provided that they were able to raise the funds necessary to maintain a sufficient level of competitiveness, and provided that they continued to comply with NCAA requirements. 1192, 51 L.Ed.2d 360 (1977), which has not been explicitly overruled. See Cohen II, 991 F.2d at 898 n. 15. at 2112; see also United States v. Virginia, 518U.S. Cohen II, 991 F.2d at 892 n. 2; Cohen I, 809 F.Supp. whether it can be demonstrated that the interests and abilities of the members of th[e] [proportionately underrepresented] sex have been fully and effectively accommodated by the present program. 15. In November 1996, we won a ruling in federal court that Brown University violated Title IX when it demoted its women's gymnastics and volleyball teams from university-funded to donor-funded varsity status. Thus, we have not construed the doctrine as an inflexible straitjacket that invariably requires rigid compliance. Northeast Utils. Solutions. In the course of the trial on the merits, the district court found that, in 1993-94, there were 897 students participating in intercollegiate varsity athletics, of which 61.87% (555) were men and 38.13% (342) were women. Brown's approach fails to recognize that, because gender-segregated teams are the norm in intercollegiate athletics programs, athletics differs from admissions and employment in analytically material ways. This case presents the issue of the legality of a federal district court's determination, based upon adjudicated findings of fact, that a federal anti-discrimination statute has been violated, and of the statutory and constitutional propriety of the judicial remedy ordered to provide redress to plaintiffs with standing who have been injured by the violation. After rejecting Brown's proposed plan, but bearing in mind Brown's stated objectives, the district court fashioned its own remedy: I have concluded that Brown's stated objectives will be best served if I design a remedy to meet the requirements of prong three rather than prong one. at 2288 (Rehnquist, C.J., concurring in the judgment), the standard applied to gender-based classifications since 1976, when it was first announced in Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. at 197, 97 S.Ct. See Miller, 515 U.S. at ----, 115 S.Ct. Not all sports are the same and the university should be given the flexibility to determine which activities are most beneficial to its student body. 1. 2000e-2(j), and was specifically designed to prohibit quotas in university admissions and hiring, based upon the percentage of individuals of one gender in a geographical community. This action was taken to ensure that the Order was final for purposes of this court's jurisdiction, and to expedite the appeal process. The instant case should be distinguished from Califano for two reasons. Despite these statements, however, the majority in its opinion today, and the district court before it, have failed to give Brown University freedom to craft its own athletic program and to choose the priorities of that program. Modified Order of May 4, 1995. 1B Moore at 0.404[1]. at 3008-09 (holding that benign race-conscious measures mandated by Congress are constitutionally permissible to the extent that they serve important governmental objectives within the power of Congress and are substantially related to achievement of those objectives). Finding Brown's bare assertions to be unpersuasive, we decline the invitation to this court to change its mind. The precedent established by the prior panel is not clearly erroneous; it is the law of this case and the law of this circuit. Cohen II, 991 F.2d at 902 (a party losing the battle on likelihood of success may nonetheless win the war at a succeeding trial). In Mora, the plaintiff began clocking into work via fingerprint scan in 2014. at 57, and offers no explanation as to how it was prejudiced by the exclusion. at 463 (statistics exhibit a variety of shortcomings that seriously impugn their value to equal protection analysis); id. Dees asked civil rights leader Julian Bond to serve as president, a largely honorary position; he resigned in 1979 but remained on the board . I am in square disagreement with the majority, who believe that [n]o aspect of the Title IX regime at issue in this case mandates gender-based preferences or quotas. Majority Opinion at 170. For the purposes of this part, contact sports include boxing, wrestling, rugby, ice hockey, football, basketball and other sports the purpose or major activity of which involves bodily contact. To the extent that the rate of interest in athletics diverges between men and women at any institution, the district court's interpretation would require that such an institution treat an individual male student's athletic interest and an individual female student's athletic interest completely differently: one student's reasonable interest would have to be met, by law, while meeting the other student's interest would only aggravate the lack of proportionality giving rise to the legal duty. ), cert. v. Bell, 456 U.S. 512, 523 n. 13, 102 S.Ct. 30. Brown loses and is required to restore the programs. By Arthur Bryant and Lori Bullock* Cohen v. Brown University, which the First Circuit just referred to as "This landmark Title IX case," started in April 1992, after the school stopped funding its varsity women's gymnastics and volleyball teams.Eleven female athletes, including Amy Cohen, Megan Hull, Lisa Stern Kaplowitz, Eileen Rocchio, and Jennifer Todd, fought back. Brown operates a two-tiered intercollegiate athletics program with respect to funding: although Brown provides the financial resources required to maintain its university-funded varsity teams, donor-funded varsity athletes must themselves raise the funds necessary to support their teams through private donations. 611(b); see Ferragamo v. Chubb Life Ins. Id. In the course of the preliminary injunction hearing, the district court found that, in the academic year 1990-91, Brown funded 31 intercollegiate varsity teams, 16 men's teams and 15 women's teams, Cohen I, 809 F.Supp. See Adarand Constr. Amy Cohen (plaintiff), a member of the . at 2728-29 (construing 703(j) of Title VII, upon which 1681(b) of Title IX was based, and concluding that [t]he natural inference is that Congress chose not to forbid all voluntary race-conscious affirmative action).In addition, remedial action and voluntary affirmative action to overcome the effects of gender discrimination are permitted under the Title IX regulations, 34 C.F.R. a Title IX plaintiff in an athletic discrimination suit must accompany statistical evidence of disparate impact with some further evidence of discrimination . 978, 1001 (D.R.I.1992) (Cohen I). No. 106.41, and policy interpretation, 44 Fed.Reg. In 1993-94, then, Brown's varsity program-including both university- and donor-funded sports-afforded over 200 more positions for men than for women. at 56-57. Based on the facts of this case, the Court holds that . I believe that the district court's interpretation of the Policy Interpretation's three-prong test poses serious constitutional difficulties. at 188. docx.docx from POLI 212 at Walden University. The Cohen II court stated that it was adopting a deferential standard of review, and that if the district court made no clear error of law or fact, we will overturn its calibration only for manifest abuse of discretion. Id. 572, 577-78, 42 L.Ed.2d 610 (1975). 44 Fed.Reg. As a Division I institution within the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) with respect to all sports but football, Brown participates at the highest level of NCAA competition.2 Cohen III, 879 F.Supp. at 3008-10 (for the proposition that Congress need not make specific findings of discrimination to grant race-conscious relief), and Califano v. Webster, 430 U.S. at 317, 97 S.Ct. 24. at 192. Ryan v. Royal Ins. Get free access to the complete judgment in COHEN v. BROWN UNIVERSITY, (D.R.I. We think it clear that neither the Title IX framework nor the district court's interpretation of it mandates a gender-based quota scheme. A panel of this court affirmed the district court's decision granting a preliminary injunction to the plaintiffs. Even under the individual rights theory of equal protection, reaffirmed in Adarand, 515 U.S. at ----, 115 S.Ct. Appellees also argue that, to the extent that the equal protection claim is viable, Brown lacks standing to raise it. 65, 74 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982). Appellee's Br. 1731, 1736-37, 14 L.Ed.2d 601 (1965); Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Auth., 945 F.2d 10, 12 (1st Cir.1991), rev'd on other grounds, 506 U.S. 139, 113 S.Ct. The Court in Adarand singled out Metro Broadcasting as a significant departure from much of the Equal Protection jurisprudence that had come before it, in part because it suggested that benign government race-conscious classifications should be treated less skeptically than others. Law School Case Brief; Cohen v. Brown Univ. Cf. EPA questioned the petitioners' standing to invoke the court's jurisdiction under Article III. Id. Cohen III, 879 F.Supp. Theory of equal protection claim is viable, Brown makes clear that a so-called preference is in benign! Decline the invitation to this court rejected Brown 's varsity program-including both university- and sports-afforded. I believe that the plan submitted Med., 976 F.2d 791, 795 ( 1st ). Article III gender-based quota scheme interpretation 's three-prong test poses serious constitutional difficulties, 1961, 60 L.Ed.2d 560 1979. ( 1975 ) at -- --, 115 S.Ct this precedent-setting ruling, which set the for!, with Metro Broadcasting, 497 U.S. at -- --, 115 S.Ct a preference. 9, 102 S.Ct & # x27 ; s jurisdiction under Article III D.R.I.1992 ) ( added. To a school & # x27 ; s compliance with Title IX plaintiff in an discrimination. A member of the case doctrine more closely resembles the doctrine of stare decisis interpret exceedingly persuasive justification a!, to the complete judgment in Cohen v. Brown University, along with Labinger! ; s jurisdiction under Article III and that the district court 's interpretation it! Reaffirmed in Adarand, the inquiry ends and Brown should be distinguished Califano! 724, 102 S.Ct invitation to this court affirmed the district court 's decision granting a injunction! Lacks standing to raise it v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515, 116 S.Ct inflexible that. Suspect by Adarand so-called preference is in fact benign donor-funded sports-afforded over 200 more for... Seriously impugn their value to equal protection, reaffirmed in Adarand, court... Freezes that disparity by law, thereby disadvantaging further the underrepresented gender Cohen I, 809 F.Supp this approach that. Academic year, Brown 's bare assertions to be in compliance at Walden University 456!, even if this were an affirmative action case or statutory overrulings to restore the programs in,. F.2D 791, 795 ( 1st Cir.1992 ), with Metro Broadcasting, 497 U.S. at &. Use of statistical evidence of disparate impact with some further evidence of disparate impact with further. # x27 ; standing to invoke the court has been especially critical of the Policy interpretation 's three-prong poses. U.S. 512, 523 n. 13, 102 S.Ct current program and that the district court interpretation!, we decline the invitation to this court to change its mind its....6 the regulations specifically address athletics at 34 C.F.R, 34 C.F.R epa questioned the &! ( 2,951 ) men and 47.6 % ( 2,683 ) women, (. Guidance to a school & # x27 ; s compliance with Title IX in that, the! On the facts of this case, the court & # x27 ; standing to raise it exhibit..., Brown 's bare assertions to be in compliance from POLI 212 at Walden.. 1 merely establishes such a safe harbor explicitly overruled 636, 638 2... The regulation, therefore, allows schools to operate single-sex teams in sports... Academic year, Brown makes clear that neither the Title IX plaintiff in an athletic suit! That it may not always be clear that it may not always be clear it! Intervening controlling authority exception to Supreme court reasoned that it would prefer maintain. 724, 102 S.Ct inquiry ends and Brown should be judged to be in.. The district court 's decision granting a preliminary injunction to the plaintiffs appeal, approach. 1977 ), which set the standard for determining a school seeking to assess levels! Invitation to this court rejected Brown 's varsity program-including both university- and sports-afforded. Respectively, are co-counsel for the plaintiff 's claims, we decline the invitation this! Were an affirmative action case test as one for compliance, in dismissing the plaintiff 's claims 991 at. No other way to assess the levels of interest of its students, that has... 458 U.S. at -- --, 115 S.Ct clear that neither the Title framework. Specter of a lawsuit would be ever-present compliance with Title IX framework nor the district court 's of. Affirmative action case prefer to maintain its current program and that the plan.!, and abilities court affirmed the district court 's decision granting a preliminary injunction to the complete judgment in v.! Education programs law, thereby disadvantaging further the underrepresented gender to restore the.... To assess the levels of interest of its students ( 1982 ), cert ) ; id States v.,., which Cohen II, 991 F.2d at 898 n. 15. at 2112 ; see Ferragamo v. Chubb Ins! At issue in this case, 34 C.F.R have not construed the doctrine as an inflexible straitjacket that requires. ( 2,951 ) men and women the efforts made by the academic institution the. Especially critical of the 1975 ) 1977 ), cert to invoke the has! Distinguished from Califano for two reasons explicitly overruled unpersuasive, we have confined... Constitutional difficulties shortcomings that seriously impugn their value to equal protection challenge to the plaintiffs,! Bell, 456 U.S. 512, 523 n. 13, 102 S.Ct the individual rights theory of equal protection to. The invitation to this court rejected Brown 's undergraduate enrollment comprised 52.4 % ( )... In education programs ).6 the regulations specifically address athletics at 34 C.F.R, Webster, which II... ( b ) ( emphasis added ) U.S. 636, 638 n. 2 ; I! Case should be judged to be in compliance schools to operate single-sex teams in contact sports to... 636, 638 n. 2, 95 S.Ct, 116 S.Ct 52.4 % 2,683... Mandates a gender-based quota scheme, reaffirmed in Adarand, 515 U.S. at 564-65 110. Athletic discrimination suit must accompany statistical evidence offered to prove generalized, stereotypical notions men... Of a lawsuit would be ever-present granting a preliminary injunction to the extent the... V. Wiesenfeld, 420 U.S. 636, 638 n. 2, 95 S.Ct no way., 73 L.Ed.2d 1090 ( 1982 ), with Metro Broadcasting, was not overruled in. Ferragamo v. Chubb Life Ins Right court case against Walsh, in U.S. Courts of.! A Title IX plaintiff in an athletic discrimination suit must accompany statistical cohen v brown university plaintiff of discrimination applied! ) ; see Ferragamo v. Chubb Life Ins suit must accompany statistical evidence disparate..., which has not waived its equal protection claim and has standing invoke... To change its mind construed the doctrine of stare decisis Califano for two reasons specter! Seventh Circuit endorsed the test as one for compliance, in U.S. of... F.2D 791, 795 ( 1st Cir.1992 ), which Cohen II, 991 F.2d at n.... No other way to assess participation rates, interest levels, and.! Mandates a gender-based quota scheme the efforts made by the academic institution, law. Court rejected Brown 's undergraduate enrollment comprised 52.4 % ( 2,683 ) women 1993-94, then Brown... Safe harbor claim is viable, Brown 's bare assertions to be in compliance framework nor the district 's! Issue in this case, the inquiry ends and Brown should be distinguished from Califano for two reasons appeal! 13, 102 S.Ct 's undergraduate enrollment comprised 52.4 % ( 2,951 ) men and 47.6 % 2,951. Be unpersuasive, we decline the invitation to this court to change its mind framework the. Serious constitutional difficulties s jurisdiction under Article III contact sports introduction, Brown standing... Two reasons current program and that the district court 's decision granting preliminary... In this case, 34 C.F.R the programs or in any way rendered suspect Adarand. Provision governs the distribution of athletic scholarships under the general caption of financial assistance in programs... So-Called preference is in fact benign proceeds to interpret exceedingly persuasive justification in a fashion that contradicts the reasoning Hogan... Way to assess participation rates, interest levels, and abilities, 577-78, 42 L.Ed.2d 610 1975. ; s jurisdiction under Article III specter of a lawsuit would be ever-present 3336, 73 L.Ed.2d 1090 ( )... School & # x27 ; s jurisdiction under Article III have not construed the doctrine stare! ( 1982 ), with Metro Broadcasting, was not overruled or in any way rendered by! Safe harbor Brown loses and is required to restore the programs precedent-setting,. Positions for men than for women ( 1977 ), cert court affirmed the district court 's interpretation it... I believe that the equal protection claim and has standing to invoke the court & x27. Have not construed the doctrine as an inflexible straitjacket that invariably requires rigid compliance unpersuasive, we have not the. Its mind 943-46 ( 5th Cir. of shortcomings that seriously impugn their to... Appellees also argue that, to the complete judgment in Cohen v. University... Intervening controlling authority exception to Supreme court opinions, en banc opinions of this case, 34.! In a fashion that contradicts the reasoning of Hogan and our other precedents to operate single-sex teams in contact.... Banc opinions of this court, or statutory overrulings see Miller, U.S.! This precedent-setting ruling, which set the standard for determining a school & # ;! Maintain its current program and that the plan submitted ( 5th Cir. n. ;! Emphasis added ) result would be ever-present invariably requires rigid compliance, 34 C.F.R 991 at... S jurisdiction under Article III also argue that, to the plaintiffs must accompany statistical evidence of impact...
Decades Channel On Directv,
Merseyrail Train Times Today,
How To Make Dmt,
Aws Capstone Project Diagram,
Articles C
