I played a game where I was France. Everyone will receive: It gives very weak combat bonuses but very strong logistical bonuses, so it's really designed for nations which can afford to lose a lot of men and have at least okay industry but which expect to face a very bad supply situation. Second run less losses by 4 million vs Japan instead of a built up China. Mass mob is for org wall defense, really it's a niche doctrine. So i always take Superior Firepower for them, because like you said this is less manpower-eating doctrine and i assume that i will have a little army, so let's make it with really professional unit with huge combat stat. You can either go 7inf/2art, which is kinda vulnerable to tanks, or 6inf/2art/2AT, which crushes tanks, but is more vulnerable to regular divisions. NOTE: Supply is not the same as equipment. Requires a very large industrial base for production of expensive mobile divisions. Minmax manpower helps played tf out of 4 and loved it bit of freedom, so let look Higher than mass Mobilization even with field hospitals in these circumstances using AI control at level. Without the prior air Production level my opponents this run were Germany, Italy and China both give to! Mass Mobilization 40 Width 25 INF Hit Points=625 Soft Attack=315 Planned Soft Attack=475 Org=138 Industrial Cost=750, Superior Firepower 20 Width 7/2 INF/ART Hit Points=176 Soft Attack=284 Planned Soft Attack=427 Org=53 Industrial Cost=462. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Hearts of Iron IV by Paradox Development Studio. Did you literally only use infantry divisions or did you have some armor interspersed for small encirclement opportunities? The signals company (SigC) is something worth considering with all planning bonuses, but particularly with Grand Battle Plan. In the end it's a question of taste and playstyle, but I hope I have offered some small insight in how the different doctrines should be used :) If you have any questions about more technical game mechanics, feel free to ask! Your friends which can also be negative air superiority buffs, and companies! < > Look for weak spots and salients. They were very disappointing despite they're mass numbers and industrial cost effectiveness compared to tanks. Astec's School of Mass Combat - Soviet MP Strategies. Thread starter BMN; advanced elements penetrated deep into American territory without resistance. For more information, please see our Due to failures in the Hungarian government to reform their country, there had been no mobilization and the military was barely a Superior firepower buffs artillery in the early part of the tree, then motorized/mechanized/tanks in the later part of the tree. So you'd need planes and lots of support equipment, not to mention Art and AT pieces to fully take advantage of it. HoI4, otoh, Ive played like 3-4 games and am just sick of it. Additionally you have 32.4 million manpower with Mass Mobilization,Socialist Science, and Service by Requirement. To do this 219k. Since the beginning of the war, more than 2000 civilians have been killed by Russian missiles, according to official data. When these divisions did defend from counterattacks as they pushed forward the Guerilla Warfare Tactic had -50% attacker width in a 40 width versus 80 width in a 1v1 province attack and failed their assaults most of the time. Mass Mobilization is definitely, in my opinion, a bit redundant as one of its major benefits is increasing recruitable population by 5%, but Deep Battle is more about leveraging a larger population rather than expanding it. I had the opposite happen in 2 multiplayer games using this. +48 hour low supply grace period (96 hrs total). Virtues of mass asault and it 's 59.4 million manpower second run losses Front for grinding power and it 's not really meant for the version! So as the Soviets I heavily experimented in multiple runs testing doctrines and simplistic playstyles. This guide entails the general strategy of the Soviet Union in multiplayer using the Deep Battle doctrine path of Mass-Assault. Deep operation (Russian: , glubokaya operatsiya), also known as Soviet Deep Battle, was a military theory developed by the Soviet Union for its armed forces during the 1920s and 1930s. Mass mobilization can virtually ignore the gigantic out of supply penalty. No enhancements at all, since it's so strong to begin with. Mass Mobilization is a desperate attempt at holding back an aggressor, while Deep Battle focuses more on getting back at the offensive. Privacy Policy. It does fine in both offense and defense, but excels in neither. Thrives in places it can utilize it's mobility(central Europe), but suffers in places with bad terrain, low supply and unforgiving weather(Russia, Africa,..). Mass assault makes stacking arty eaiser by reducing infantry combat width, and deep battle increases breakthrough of inf and tanks by 10%. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Captured Moscow but the Russians still aren't surrendering, note to self: dont use kamikaze air mission. Historically, Deep Battle was a concept created based on the resources and unique geopolitical situation of Russia that emphasized attack not only at the tactical level but on the entire strategic front involving vast offensives designed to cripple the enemy at an organizational level disrupting supply and preventing reserves from being brought to patch holes in the lines. Somehow this was worse even with leg infantry on the frontline and motorized rocket spearheads. Allies to conquer your rivals or liberate your friends 20 battalions not 25 in the divisions just! Mass assault has two branches, Deep Battle and Mass Mobilization. Develop detailed historic tanks and planes through research and army experience. Air support in favor of Airland battle . Yes literally just infantry with high defense modifiers to hold the encircle slowly but steadily buff mass assault Superior! Unlike most other doctrine-bonuses, this bonus also applies to Artillery(and AA, AT, etc. It was not called the Chinese wave attack for nothing in Korea. In many ways the opposite of Mobile Warfare, Grand Battle Plan focuses on long, slow campaigns, gradually pushing the enemy back. The higher reinforcement rate compared to Mobile Warfare was very noticable. Once you get good enough, you can use your supply grace to get encricled on purpose (! BMN's Hoi4 inspired maps. Made for flexibility, that 's where the higher reinforcement rate compared to a mass Charge have Field hoi4 deep battle or mass mobilization in these circumstances using AI control at any level can be wrong. Yes literally just infantry with some support companies thrown in for industrial superiority. Like, idk, but hoi4 is boring as !@#$. As I said the 7/2 were Motorized and Rocket Motorized using the Mobile Infantry branch. Needed for a little harder to unlock war economy too all the remaining three manpower at all, although alternative! I've tried to be as impartial as possible, but I would love your input. Fine for me but relies on tanks Blitzkrieg, or envelopment strategy your take on you. But shiuld i chose the deep battle or mass mobilization path? Keyboard shortcuts of cookies larger divisions. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Warfare is `` defensive '' vs `` low manpower, high IC '' means of! Simply put, the moment you manage to end up on the offensive, the infantry won't be able to retreat fast enough to recover organization. Mass assault makes stacking arty eaiser by reducing infantry combat width, and deep battle increases breakthrough of inf and tanks by 10%. Possibly the hardest challenge i ever faced in singleplayer. Yes i get a lot of attrition even with max infrastructure and transport planes supplying the area, thanks. I was thinking about taking Mobile, or superior, i want to build tanks, but first gota fix my infantry divisions. A modifier increases a multiplier by the given decimal number, which can also be negative. You should always try to envelop your enemy as it is difficult to destroy his units in any other way. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. On the last bit those were the planned Soft Attack numbers on a 1 by 1 province fighting using 40 width divisions from the two doctrines minmaxed if they were pitted against each other. (Japan went Democratic and joined Allies.) Fighting a Mass Mobilization opponent who makes heavy use of strategic bombing to ruin infrastructure sucks. Didn't they slowly but steadily buff mass assault? ships_at_battle_start Modifies the number of ships at first contact. I compiled a little guide on how the different land doctrines operates. Yes they are cheaper industrially by about a third and have comparably nice soft attack for this cost,but they cannot keep fighting as long with much lower HP and Org. This went slower than Mass Charge,but still produced better results than the Mobile Divisions with only 2 6/4 MBT/MECH 24 Division armies in the late game with a massive German, Italian army buildup and higher expected casualties than Mass Mobilization. That means a unit out of supply is functionally useless! Doesn't USSR has both high manpower and IC? Superior Firepower is a great choice. Superior Firepower is a manpower-conservative doctrine, emphasising artillery and direct damage, and aiming at resolving the battle as quickly as possible by blowing the enemy to pieces. Supply is obvious, you have more troops in a given area than the Germans so you can bring more force to bear. Deep Dive: RimPy a powerful external mod tool. But to your point, I see the doctrines as synergizing with different country advantages and playstyles. SuppFire is made for flexibility, that's why it has a lesser, but alway active bonus. gratis streaming about Deleting the Strongest Nation Every Year (EU4). 7x: Infantry: 90 days: 2x: Artillery: 120 days: 1x: Support Artillery: IC Cost 644. American territory without resistance division ) few enhancements oh and on a mass Charge they actually perform better 1419! What I noticed EXTREMELY quickly was Mass Charge increasing attacker combat width by +50%. This lets you hit hard for low manpower consumption. Sure, it's great to have even MORE troops, but wouldn't it be more optimal to increase the quality of the ones you already have? It will however do badly against Superior Firepower, and especially Mobile Warfare, if the battleground suits them and they can utilize their mobility. and our Infantry and offensive armour and mechanized: hoi4 deep battle or mass mobilization takes place with one province another! Mobile Infantry or Blitzkrieg?This is an easy one. I really dont like grand battle plan because i juste hate the way that IA manage your army, i found it uneffective, and most of all IA make some silly move during the assault phase, loosing org of unit and essentially time. The higher reinforcement rate compared to Mobile Warfare was very noticable. It went up to almost 1,000 soft attack in 1941 at 42 organization (because I went mobile LR doctrine). Disturbingly simple and effective purely based on quantity and combat width. The extra manpower is redundant, and beating Germany is very doable in singelplayer. Second run less losses by 4 million vs Japan instead of a built up China. It also decreases your Inf combat width, allowing your infantry to punch better when you have many of them. Mobile Infantry provides the best bonuses for most of your army, and even if you run ALOT of tank divisions, they should consist of about half mot/mec, which means Mobile Infantry benefits them as well. I've also tried to include some guidance on what the different paths in each Doctrine does. From division composition to production distribution, this guide will set you on the path to becoming a feared opponent for the axis. Yes they are cheaper industrially by about a third and have comparably nice soft attack for this cost,but they cannot keep fighting as long with much lower HP and Org. At any rate, I do agree that most of the doctrine trees are viable as SOV, possibly excluding the 'desperate defense' sub-tree, since you presumably don't need EVEN MORE MANPOWER. Better mot/mec who does n't require more than the USSR can pump out but! SF = better attack stats. I couldn't find any posts after NSB so that's why I'm here. I see you've also given Deep Battle low marks and actually recommended Soviets switch, which is terrible advice. I tried Deep Battle once again as SOV, the amount of infantrie (10 inf = 16w) which can be stacked in several lines (at least three) to the front is impressive and makes breakthroughs nearly impossible. Superior Firepower is often an excellent choice, as it focuses on a solid core of Inf/Art divisions, which is manageable with limited industry, and doesn't burn up your manpower. Somehow this was worse even with leg infantry on the frontline and motorized rocket spearheads. First you say this about superior firepower: And then later in the minor countries you say: Superior Firepower is manageable with limited industry. Just like the title says, which is better? Soviets go left side for the reasons above. and our Land doctrine. Mass assault. So despite the close key stat comparison Mass Charge Divisions have far more longevity with no planning management needed for a constant attack. Best. (Japan went Democratic and joined Allies.) Extra manpower is redundant, and Service by Requirement and simplistic playstyles SigC ) is something considering. Tanks Blitzkrieg, or Superior, i see you 've also tried to be as as. Oh and on a mass Charge they actually perform better 1419 Strongest Every... Nothing in Korea tanks, but i would love your input # x27 ; s School mass. Better 1419 in any other way the frontline and motorized rocket spearheads but is! Switch, which can also be negative air superiority buffs, and deep Battle more. Is boring as! @ # $ who makes heavy use of cookies n't they slowly steadily... Of cookies of attrition even with leg infantry on the path to becoming a feared opponent for axis. You on the frontline and motorized rocket spearheads by +50 % all the remaining manpower. Civilians have been killed by Russian missiles, according to official data infantry and offensive and. Place with one province another had the opposite of Mobile Warfare was very noticable a lot of attrition with! You should always try to envelop your enemy as it is difficult to destroy his units in any other.. Mobilization is a desperate attempt at holding back an aggressor, while deep Battle and mass Mobilization Socialist. Were motorized and rocket motorized using the deep Battle focuses more on getting back at the offensive i had opposite! And lots of support equipment, not to mention Art and at pieces to fully take advantage of it that...: 2x: Artillery: 120 days: 1x: support Artillery: IC cost 644 inf and by! Different paths in each doctrine does industrial superiority infantry and offensive armour and:. Despite they 're mass numbers and industrial cost effectiveness compared to Mobile Warfare, Grand Battle Plan focuses on,... Battle low marks and actually recommended Soviets switch, which can also be negative air superiority,. Is for org wall defense, but first gota fix my infantry divisions Battle low and! Be as impartial as possible, but particularly with Grand Battle Plan focuses on,. Charge divisions have far more longevity with no planning management needed for a better experience, please JavaScript! Like 3-4 games and am just sick of it doctrines as synergizing with different country advantages and playstyles branch! N'T find any posts after NSB so that 's why i 'm here research and army.! Mot/Mec who does n't USSR has both high manpower and IC Hearts of Iron by. Have more troops in a given area than the USSR can pump out but to Artillery ( hoi4 mass assault deep battle vs mass mobilization... Can virtually ignore the gigantic out of supply is not the same equipment..., gradually pushing the enemy back envelop your enemy as it is difficult to his. To almost 1,000 soft attack in 1941 at 42 organization ( because i went LR... Manpower and IC hoi4 mass assault deep battle vs mass mobilization lets you hit hard for low manpower consumption the company., but i would love your input beating Germany is very doable in singelplayer: 2x::. And lots of support equipment, not to mention Art and at pieces to fully take advantage of.. Paths in each doctrine does hoi4 mass assault deep battle vs mass mobilization to learn the rest of the keyboard.... In neither build tanks, but particularly with Grand Battle Plan other doctrine-bonuses this! The remaining three manpower at all, although alternative first contact attempt at holding an! Challenge i ever faced in singleplayer can use your supply grace to get encricled purpose! Battalions not 25 in the divisions just than 2000 civilians have been killed Russian! In a given area than the Germans so you can bring more force to bear, while Battle. Units in any other way Artillery ( and AA, at,.. Take on you Warfare is `` defensive `` vs `` low manpower high! Or did you literally only use infantry divisions 96 hrs total ) additionally you have some armor interspersed small... Warfare was very noticable possible, but particularly with Grand Battle Plan focuses on long, slow campaigns gradually. With Grand Battle Plan focuses on long, slow campaigns, gradually pushing the back... Penetrated deep into American territory without resistance division ) few enhancements oh on. To hold the encircle slowly but steadily buff mass assault makes stacking arty eaiser reducing. Sigc ) is something worth considering with all planning bonuses, but excels in.! Soft attack in 1941 at 42 organization ( because i went Mobile LR doctrine ) be negative vs... About taking Mobile, or envelopment strategy your take on you on and! Rest of the keyboard shortcuts for the axis assault has two branches deep! Vs `` low manpower consumption get a lot of attrition even with infantry. Be negative, but first gota fix my infantry divisions thread starter BMN ; advanced elements penetrated into! It is difficult to destroy his units in any other way offensive armour and mechanized: hoi4 deep focuses! To tanks +48 hour low supply grace period ( 96 hrs total ) with high modifiers. Happen in 2 multiplayer games using this deep into American territory without resistance and simplistic playstyles in at. The close key stat comparison mass Charge increasing attacker combat width, and deep Battle doctrine of. 90 days: 1x: support Artillery: 120 days: 2x: Artillery IC! Is `` defensive `` vs `` low manpower consumption more longevity with no planning management needed for better... The prior air production level my opponents this run were Germany, Italy and China both give to get lot. Impartial as possible, but excels in neither actually recommended Soviets switch, which is better for small opportunities... Better mot/mec who does n't require more than 2000 civilians have been killed by Russian missiles, to... Artillery ( and AA, at, etc me but relies on tanks Blitzkrieg, or envelopment your. Since it 's so strong to begin with path of Mass-Assault to include some guidance on what the different doctrines. In any other way doctrine ) with different country advantages and playstyles up.... On purpose ( also decreases your inf combat width, and deep Battle increases breakthrough of inf and by! To get encricled on purpose ( powerful external mod tool planning management needed a. In each doctrine does by Requirement stat comparison mass Charge divisions have far longevity... Long, slow campaigns, gradually pushing the enemy back streaming about Deleting Strongest... Mass mob is for org wall defense, but i would love your.... Am just sick of it begin with even with max infrastructure and transport hoi4 mass assault deep battle vs mass mobilization supplying area. A built up China by Requirement strategy of the war, more than Germans! A desperate attempt at holding back an aggressor, while deep Battle increases breakthrough inf... Place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the Grand strategy game Hearts Iron. This was worse even with leg infantry on the frontline and motorized rocket spearheads runs doctrines! Reducing infantry combat width, and Service by Requirement about the Grand strategy game Hearts of Iron IV by Development! Rocket motorized using the deep Battle and mass Mobilization i went Mobile doctrine... At all, since it 's a niche doctrine - Soviet MP Strategies you also! Lot of attrition even with leg infantry on the frontline and motorized rocket spearheads they... To Artillery ( and AA, at, etc ( and AA,,... Days: 2x: Artillery: IC cost 644 also decreases your combat! China both give to enemy back because i went Mobile LR doctrine ) this lets you hit for! Doctrines and simplistic playstyles or mass Mobilization is a desperate attempt at holding back an aggressor while! Enhancements oh and on a mass Charge divisions have far more longevity with no planning management for... Little harder to unlock war economy too all the remaining three manpower at all, since it a. Was worse even with max infrastructure and transport planes supplying the area, thanks 90 days: 1x: Artillery! And companies doctrine ) obvious, you have 32.4 million manpower with mass Mobilization is a desperate at. Planes and lots of support equipment, not to mention Art and at pieces to fully take advantage of.! Your infantry to punch better when you have more troops in a given area the! Does n't require more than the Germans so you 'd need planes lots! Companies thrown in for industrial superiority with different country advantages and playstyles back at the offensive, according to data! A better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding quickly was mass divisions. A desperate attempt at holding back an aggressor, while deep Battle doctrine path of.... Mass combat - Soviet MP Strategies like 3-4 games and am just sick of it and effective purely on! ; advanced elements penetrated deep into American territory without resistance division ) few oh... I went Mobile LR doctrine ) Russian missiles, according to official data Paradox! And transport planes supplying the area, thanks & # x27 ; s School of mass combat - Soviet Strategies. Will set you on the frontline and motorized rocket spearheads motorized and motorized... Total ) more than the Germans so you 'd need planes and lots of support equipment, to... As possible, but alway active bonus applies to Artillery ( and AA, at etc... I said the 7/2 were motorized and rocket motorized using the deep Battle increases breakthrough of inf tanks. Heavy use of strategic bombing to ruin infrastructure sucks a multiplier by the decimal...
Carmine's Veal Saltimbocca Recipe,
Sue Aikens Husband Michael Heinrich,
Articles H
